EKSPLORASI DETERMINAN AUDIT REPORT LAG (AUDIT DELAY) PERUSAHAAN GO PUBLIK DI INDONESIA

  • Supriyati Supriyati STIE Perbanas
  • Triana Mayasari STIE Perbanas
  • Kadek Pranetha STIE Perbanas
  • Moch. Satrya STIE Perbanas
  • Anike Wulansari STIE Perbanas
Keywords: audit delay, profitability, profit and loss, public accountant size, auditor opinion, company size, going concern, current ratio

Abstract

Financial reporting should be published timeliness because having to need by shareholder and other user to predicted and dicision making. The research extends prior research by examining the multivariate relationship between audit delay and a set independent variable. The research examines the influence of profitability, profit and loss, auditor opinion, last auditor opinion, public accountants size and company size influence the audit delay on LQ 45 Company, Banking and Jakarta Islamic Index Company from 2005 to 2009. And then, This research examinies moderating between going concern and current ratio toward audit delay and independent variable.

This research represent the empirical test used sensus method in data collection which took took  all the companies listed in Jakarta Stock Exchange as the sample and confirmatory method with auditor in Public Accountant Office. The analysis hypothesis is using Multiple Regression, before hypothesis test, normality data test using kolmogorof-Smirnov test with the program spss version for windows. The result of multiple linear regression shows that profit/loss and the size of public accountant  office influence significantly toward audit delay. Average of Audit delay is 72 day and this isi smaller than last research  in Indonesian or other country.

This research shows that 1) most public companies are still ignoring profitability, 2) Audit conducted by the Big Four Accounting Firm still dominates in Indonesiaan, 3) Knowledge or competence of the management in preparing the consolidated profit or loss is not sufficient because the increasing complexity of the company, 4) Opinion of last year is not a fundamental reference for auditors during the audit, 5) Going concern has an indirect influence on audit delay, 6) the company which has total assest of the means reflects the company was large as well so that companies that have a large size indicates that certain transactions, 7) The existence of strong pressure from others for the companies listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange.

References

Ahmad, Nizarul dan Subekti. 2005. Pengujian Empiris Audit Report Lag Menggunakan Client Cycle Time dan Firm Cycle Time. SNA VII Solo.
Ahmad dan Khairul. 2001. Audit Delay and The Timeliness of Corporate Reporting : Malaysian Evidence.
www.hicbusiness.org/biz2001proceedings/khairul%20kamarudin%202.pdf diakses tgl 3 April 2010.
Aston, Willingham, and Elliot. 1987. An Empirical Analysis of Audit Delay. Journal of Accounting Research Vol 25.
Carslaw, Charles dan Steven.1991. An Examination of Audit Delay : Further Evidence From New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research. Vol 22 No 85, p 21-23.
Ghozali. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Edisi 4. Semarang : BP-Undip.
Halim, Varianda. 2000. Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Delay, Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan-perusahaan di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol 2 No1 April, hal 63-75.
Henderson, Charlene dan Steven. 2000. Research Notes an Examination of Audit Report Lag for Bank: Apanel Data Approach. A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol 19 No 2.
Hossain dan Peter J. Taylor. 1998. An Examination Of Audit Delay : Evidence From Pakistan. Working Paper
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2009. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2007. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Jusuf, Haryono. 2007. Auditing. Edisi pertama. Yogyakarta:BP-YKPN
Karim dan Ahmed. 2005. Does Regulatory Change Improve Financial Reporting Timeliness? Evidence From Bangladeshi Listed Companies. Working Paper Series Working Paper No 30.
Kieso, Weygandt dan Warfield. 2002. Akuntansi Intermediate. Edisi sepuluh. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
Knechel dan Payne. 2001. Additional Evidence on Audit Report Lag. Auditing: A Journal of Pratice and Theory Vol 20 No 1. March, p 137-146.
Mamduh. 2007. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta.
Made. 2004. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Rentang Waktu Penyajian Laporan Keuangan ke Publik (Studi Empiris Mengenai Keberadaan Divisi Internal Audit Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta). SNA VII. Bali.
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing. Edisi Keenam. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Owusu, Stephen and Ansah. 2000. Timeliness of Corporate Financial Reporting in Emerging Capital Market : Empirical Evidence From The Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. Journal Accounting and Business. Vol 30,p 241.
Subekti dan Novi. 2004. Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Delay di Indonesia. SNA VII. Bali.
Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung : CV.Alfabeta
Wermer, James dan Thomas. 2000. An Empirical Examination of Audit Report Lag Using Client and Audit Firm Cycle Times. Journal of Pratice and Theory Vol 16 No 1.
............Http://www.cbpa.drake.edu/dodd/research/mbaa/mbaaarl paper/2000.doc diakses tanggal 3 April 2010
Wiwik Utami. 2006. Analisis Determinan Audit Delay Kajian Empiris di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Buletin Penelitian No.09.
............keputusan BAPEPAM Nomor: Kep-36/PM/2003
............keputusan dieksi PT. Bursa Efek Jakarta (BEJ) Nomor Kep 307/bej/07-2004 tentang Peraturan Nomor I-H II-6 www.bapepam.go.id).
Yuliana dan Aloysia Yanti Ardianti. 2004. “Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Delay di Indonesia”. Modus, vol 16 (2): 135-146.
Published
2011-08-16
Abstract viewed = 404 times
PDF downloaded = 606 times