STUDI KOMPARATIF ABORSI DI INDONESIA DAN KOREA SELATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY

  • R. Aj. Nindya Rizky Utamie Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: Law, Abortion, Feminist Legal Theory

Abstract

Abortion in Indonesia is still considered taboo and criminalized, while abortion in South Korea is the opposite. Countries that use the same legal system do not mean their regulations are also the same. Abortion raises different opinions from Pro-Life and Pro-Choice people. Analysis of feminist legal theory, especially radical feminism, is used to see the response of Indonesia and South Korea to abortion. This research aims to: 1) determine abortion regulations in Indonesia and South Korea; and 2) analysis of feminist legal theory regarding abortion in Indonesia and South Korea. This research is normative legal research or doctrinal research, using a statutory-regulatory approach, contextual approach, and comparative study. The data sources used are primary legal materials, namely Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, the Criminal Code, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. Secondary legal materials are in the form of literature reviews related to legal materials that are appropriate to the research topic. The research shows that abortion in Indonesia is not fully legalized, in contrast to South Korea which has lifted the ban on abortion after the decision of the South Korean Constitutional Court. Based on the analysis of Feminist Legal Theory, Indonesia still has not accepted and accommodated all forms of demands from feminism, while South Korea considers abortion to be a woman's right and what is within a woman is her full right.

 

References

BUKU
Mochtar, Z. A. Hiariej, E. O. S. (2033). Dasar-Dasar ilmu Hukum Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan

PUTUSAN PENGADILAN ASING
Jeong ___-Won, Gwangju District Court, 2016GoDan3266, (2017Hun-Ba127, 11 April 2019)

JURNAL
Chairil, A. Shalahuddin, H. 2021. Studi Kritis Feminist Legal Theory Menurut Perspektif Islamic Worldview. Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 33(1)
Dewi, F. Y. Utami, S. A. Bahtiar, T. 2022. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Sebagai Pelaku Aborsi Akibat Perkosaan. Jurnal Rechtens, 11(1)
Fauzia, R. 2022. Sejarah perjuangan Perempuan Indonesia Mengupayakan Kesetaraan Dalam Teori Feminisme. Journal Of Comprehensive Science, 1(4)
Maridjan, G. N. 2019. Aborsi dalam Penerapan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Lex Crimen VIII, (6)
Ningrumsari, F. D. Azisa, N. Heryani, W. 2022. Paradigma Teori Hukum Feminis Terhadap Peraturan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 14(2)
Novita. 2023. Aborsi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. BelomBahadat : Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, 13(1)
Nusawakan, D. 2019. Kebijakan Kriminal Terhadap Tindakan Aborsi. Pasapua Health Journal, 1(1), 18-26
Saputra, A. 2023. Aborsi dalam Kacamata Hukum di Indonesia : Penjelasan dan Kontroversi. Jurnal Mahasiswa Indonesia, 1(1), 1-15
Saputri, A. S. 2023. Criminal Justice Of Children as Perpetrators Of Abortus Provocatus Criminals Due To Promiscuity. Indonesian Journal Of Multidisciplinary Science
Shahrullah. R. S. Syarief, E. Sudirman, L. Surya, T. 2020. Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Abortus Provokatus Terhadap Korban Pemerkosaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 15(2)
Suryani, L. 2021. Faktor-Faktor Pendorong dan Praktik Aborsi di Indonesia. JSGA: Journal Studi Gender dan Anak, 8(2)

SKRIPSI
Evelyn, M. (2020) Strategi Joint Action For Reproductive Justice Dalam Dekriminalisasi Larangan Aborsi Di Korea Selatan. Skripsi, Universitas Andalas.

WEBSITE
Guttmacher Institute. (2018) https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/462-367.png, “Abortion in Asia”. Akses 4 November 2023
Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/regions/asia/republic-korea-south-korea, “Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion”. Akses pada 4 November 2023
Merelli, A. (2017). https://qz.com/896566/where-does-the-term-pro-life-come-from, “A Brief History of A Marketing Masterpiece: Branding the Anti-Abortion Movement “Pro-Life””. Akses pada 6 November 2023
Siaran Pers Komnas Perempuan Memperingati Hari Aborsi Aman Internasional, 2021. (2021). https://komnasperempuan.go.id/siaran-pers-detail/siaran-pers-komnas-perempuan-memperingati-hari-aborsi-aman-internasional-28-september-jakarta-29-september-2021, “Mewujudkan Akses dan Layanan Aborsi Aman Legal bagi Perempuan Korban Perkosaan sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan HAM Perempuan”. Akses pada 3 November 2023
Statutes of the Republic of Korea. https://elaw.klri.re.kr, “Criminal Act”. Akses pada 4 November 2023
Tim CNN Indonesia. (2019) https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20190412124508-255-385645/korea-selatan-legalkan-aborsi-setelah-66-tahun-larangan#:~:text=Mahkamah%20Konstitusi%20Korsel%20baru%20saja,bahwa%20pelarangan%20aborsi%20tidak%20konstitusional., “Korea Selatan Legalkan Aborsi Setelah 66 Tahun Larangan”. Akses pada 4 November 2023
Umeda, S. (2021). https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021-03-18/south-korea-abortion-decriminalized-since-january-1-2021/, “South Korea: Abortion Decriminalized since January 1, 2021”. Akses 4 November 2023
Yoon, L. (2022). https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/06/09/south-koreas-constitutional-right-abortion, “South Korea’s Constitutional Right to Abortion”. Akses pada 3 November 2023
http://gender.cawater-info.net/knowledge_base/rubricator/feminism_e.htm, “History and Theory of Feminism”, Akses pada 6 November 2023
Published
2023-09-28
Abstract viewed = 288 times
PDF downloaded = 411 times